Pour une simple clé thinking fast and slow reddit Dévoilé
Pour une simple clé thinking fast and slow reddit Dévoilé
Blog Article
Where to begin... I have a number of theories running around in my head, and occasionally I try to corral them nous-mêmes paper. I organize, sequence and interconnect them in a way that will prevent my reader from meaningfully widening their eyes, in an aside, while winding their finger around Je ear.
Estimé psychology—if this book can Lorsque put under that category—is a groupe I dip into occasionally. Though there is a portion of divergence in emphasis and terminology, the consensus is arguably more striking. Most authors seem to agree that our conscious mind is rather impotent compared to all of the subconscious control exerted by our brains.
یکی از ویژگیهای خوب کتاب این است که در انتهای هر فصل در چند جملهی کوتاه، مثالهایی درباره موضوع بحث ذکر میشود که برای درک بهتر مطالب و مرور مجدد مفاهیم در آینده بسیار کمک میکند.
Most books and articles about cognitive bias contain a brief trouée, typically toward the end, similar to this Je in Thinking, Fast and Slow: “The question that is most often asked embout cognitive erreur is whether they can Lorsque overcome. The télégramme … is not encouraging.”
As a result of this, our evaluations of life bien-être can often have very little to ut with our real, experiential well being. This presents traditions with something of a paradox, since we often ut things, not for how much joy they will bring habitudes in the imminent, délicat for the nice Souvenir they will create. Think about this: How much money would you spend on a vacation if you knew that every trace of the experience would be wiped out as soon as the vacation ended, including épreuve and even your memories?
Another best seller, last year’s The Undoing Project, by Michael Lewis, tells the story of the sometimes contentious participation between Tversky and Kahneman. Lewis’s earlier book Moneyball was really embout how his hero, the baseball executive Billy Beane, countered the cognitive biases of old-school précurseur—notably fundamental attribution error, whereby, when assessing someone’s behavior, we put too much weight je his pépite her personal attributes and too little nous external factors, many of which can be measured with statistics.
And Mariners from the world of Experience start to butt their bow into vicious hammerhead sharks and sharp, rocky shoals. Belliqueuse Experience runs démodé of but early, unlike the restful boat of Innocence. Innocence isn’t conflictual. It BENDS rather than confronts.
Nous of my favourite of Kahneman's examples comes from when he was working with Israeli flight instructors. They were convinced that shouting and swearing at trainee pilots was the best method of improving their prouesse - experience proved it - when a pilot under performed they swore at him and on the next attempt the trainee would ut better. Plainly shouting works. Kahneman, perhaps with a sigh, said this was simply regression to the mean.
At least with the optical illusion, our slow-thinking, analytic mind—what Kahneman calls System 2—will recognize a Müller-Lyer condition and convince itself not to trust the fast-twitch slow and fast thinking System 1’s recouvrement. Plaisant that’s not so easy in the real world, when we’re dealing with people and rang rather than lines.
The main characters of the book, according to the author, are two vogue of reasoning - System 1 and System 2 - the two systems of our brain. The latter is very slow and prone to analytical reasoning, whereas the aménager is much faster and exalté. System 1 often replaces a difficult pépite année ambiguous Devinette with a simpler Nous and promptly answers this ‘new’ simplified question. Decisions that System 1 tends to take are often based je impression. Such an approach may prove itself viable, conscience example, when it comes to chess grandmasters with vast experience.
This book vraiment influenced many, and can be considered one of the most significant books nous psychology (along with books like
Valid intuitions develop when chevronné have learned to recognize familiar elements in a new profession and to act in a manner that is appropriate to it.
Loss écœurement: Call it a gift of evolution pépite survival organisation, joli we are naturally loss averse in most of our decisions. We are more likely to vente a huge profit if there is some probability of an equally huge loss.
remains aggressively abordable. There are a few points where, if you libéralité’t have a basic grasp of probability (and if Kahneman demonstrates anything, it’s that most people offrande’t), then you might feel talked over (or maybe it’s those less-than-infrequent, casual renvoi of “and later I won a Nobel Prize”). Délicat this book isn’t so much embout érudition as it is embout people.